Stan Szymanski (or Encouraging Angels) is not a medical doctor. This is not medical advice. In all matters pertaining to the health and care of a human being consult a medical doctor. This is not legal, financial or personal advice. Consult appropriate professionals in those fields for that type of advice. For informational purposes only.
https://www.podbean.com/wlei/pb-c9k7y-1847973
Stan Szymanski (or Encouraging Angels) is not a medical doctor. This is not medical advice. In all matters pertaining to the health and care of a human being consult a medical doctor. This is not legal, financial or personal advice. Consult appropriate professionals in those fields for that type of advice. For informational purposes only.
From the article…’From 1939 onwards under the auspices of the Aktion T4 program, the Nazis systematically murdered 250,000 disabled people with psychiatric and physical disorders residing in institutions. The so-called “euthanasia program” also targeted many young children who would today be referred to as having learning disabilities or special educational needs. The program was named Aktion T4 after the address of its Berlin headquarters located at 4 Tiergartenstrasse.’…
Stan Szymanski (or Encouraging Angels) is not a medical doctor. This is not medical advice. In all matters pertaining to the health and care of a human being consult a medical doctor. This is not legal, financial or personal advice. Consult appropriate professionals in those fields for that type of advice. For informational purposes only.
March 2020 Intel Brief to PM Johnson: "COVID-19 WAS ENGINEERED IN WUHAN INSTITUTE OF VIROLOGY.
Stan Szymanski (or Encouraging Angels) is not a medical doctor. This is not medical advice. In all matters pertaining to the health and care of a human being consult a medical doctor. This is not legal, financial or personal advice. Consult appropriate professionals in those fields for that type of advice. For informational purposes only.
Image Credit: Somerset Church of Christ
By Stan Szymanski
Just this past Wednesday I wrote about Rep. Jody Arrington (R-TX. 19th District) had introduced H.Con.Res.15 - Calling an Article V Convention for proposing a Fiscal Responsibility Amendment to the United States Constitution and stipulating ratification by a vote of We the People, and for other purposes.
The danger of this is not that we have more fiscal responsibility mandated for our government, but that the sponsors of this bill want to use an Article V Constitutional Convention to accomplish it. This is not a ‘political’ writing; I am not telling you whom to vote for and am not advocating for one party or the other. I am writing this article today to point out the existential threat to every citizen of the United States that the potential convening of an Article V Constitutional Convention poses because the existence of our very Constitution is at stake.
I regret to report today that just since Wednesday the states of Pennsylvania and Montana now also have bills pending regarding limits on government power, balanced budget and term limits that request that an Article V Constitutional Convention be convened.
Pennsylvania House Resolution 21 is:
…’A Concurrent Resolution calling for a convention under Article V of the Constitution of the United States to consider amendments that limit the number of terms that members of Congress may serve and establish and limit the terms of office for United States Supreme Court Justices.’…(PA HR 21)
__________________________
Please refer to our proviso at the end of the article regarding any reproduction of this writing (This means those who modify my writing for their benefit and own financial gain and even plagaristically put their name on my work) and consider a donation to Encouraging Angels today. We need your support
—————————————-
In Montana House Joint Resolution No. 5 has been introduced:
…The Legislature of the State of Montana hereby applies to Congress, under the provisions of Article V of the Constitution of the United States, for the calling of a convention of the states limited to proposing amendments to the Constitution of the United States that impose fiscal restraints on the federal government, limit the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limit the terms of office for its officials and for members of Congress. (Section 1 MT. House Joint Resolution No. 5)
As I stated on Wednesday, Article V of the Constitution makes provision for amendments to the U.S. Constitution without a Constitutional Convention. If two thirds of the Senate and two thirds of the House of Representatives agree, you have an amendment to the Constitution. This is how we have come to have 27 amendments currently to the Constitution.
But politicians not only in Texas, but now in Montana and Pennsylvania feel the need to invoke the need for a Constitutional Convention (Con-Con) which has not happened since 1787 when that convention scrapped the Articles of Confederation in favor of the Constitution. A Con-Con could change everything, and not for the better this time, IMHO.
What are the dangers associated with convening a Con-Con?:
There is no constitutional authority for a limited convention.
There is no guidance on how delegates would be selected.
There is no guidance on who could qualify as a delegate.
There is no guidance on how many delegates each state could send.
There is no provision for stopping a runaway convention.
There is no provision for how rules would be established.
There is no provision for how rules would be enforced.
There is no role provided for the people to play in the process.
There is no power provided for the people to stop a convention once it starts.
There is no description of the ratification conventions Congress could choose to call.
There are no rules governing the ratification conventions Congress could choose to call.
There is no means provided for either the states or the people to challenge Congress’s choice of the method of ratification.
There is no test provided for a qualifying application submitted by a state.
The acceptance by one Congress of a state application for a convention does not bind subsequent Congresses from accepting that application.
Application for a convention submitted by one state legislature does not prevent subsequent state legislatures from revoking the previous application.
All these issues would be challenged in court and would take years to be decided.
The issues to be addressed at a convention to propose amendments would likely be moot by the time the challenges reached the U.S. Supreme Court for final adjudication.
If 100 percent of registered voters opposed an amendment proposed by a convention, but the requisite number of state legislatures or ratifying conventions (according to the process determined by Congress for consideration of proposed amendments) supported it, then that amendment would become part of the Constitution regardless of the will of the people.
The same scenario is true if a proposed amendment were approved by 100 percent of registered voters but rejected by the ratification conventions or state legislatures (according to the process determined by Congress for consideration of proposed amendments). (John Birch Society)
The delegates are -not limited- to only vote on what they were sent to the Con-Con to vote for. They could literally bring up -anything- up to and including the abolishment of our current form of government.
The vote in Montana is as early as today, March 15, 2025.
Again, I am not writing today to tell you who to vote for or what to support. I am telling you that we do not need to call a Constitutional Convention in order to amend the Constitution of the United States of America.
If ‘We The People’ of all races, creeds and politics do not stand against the calling of a Constitutional Convention, ravenous wolves may take our country from us.
If the Constitution is maimed or destroyed in the process of a Con-Con then any semblance of America ceases to exist.
Reject any calls for a Constitutional Convention.
———-
If you appreciate this article can you consider a gift to Encouraging Angels for the intelligence we provided today? Click this link to give. We need the support. Links to this article are encouraged. Reproductions of this writing are only allowed by written permission of the author and those reproductions must include this proviso of request for support, how this writing may be reproduced and following disclaimers.
All opinions are that of the authors and not necessarily that of Encouraging Angels.
All rights reserved.
Stan Szymanski (or Encouraging Angels) is not a medical doctor. This is not medical advice. In all matters pertaining to the health and care of a human being consult a medical doctor. This is the not legal, financial or personal advice. Consult appropriate professionals in those fields for that type of advice. For informational purposes only.
https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/high-dose-vitamin-d-may-slow-progression-ms-neurological-disorder
Stan Szymanski (or Encouraging Angels) is not a medical doctor. This is not medical advice. In all matters pertaining to the health and care of a human being consult a medical doctor. This is not legal, financial or personal advice. Consult appropriate professionals in those fields for that type of advice. For informational purposes only.
From the article…’However, as Sharyl Attkisson reported at the time, “No matter how they crunched the numbers, they got the same disappointing result. Flu shots have not reduced deaths among the elderly.”’…
https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/flu-vaccine-exposed-shocking-nih-discovery-they-dont-want-you-know
Stan Szymanski (or Encouraging Angels) is not a medical doctor. This is not medical advice. In all matters pertaining to the health and care of a human being consult a medical doctor. This is not legal, financial or personal advice. Consult appropriate professionals in those fields for that type of advice. For informational purposes only.
Stan Szymanski (or Encouraging Angels) is not a medical doctor. This is not medical advice. In all matters pertaining to the health and care of a human being consult a medical doctor. This is not legal, financial or personal advice. Consult appropriate professionals in those fields for that type of advice. For informational purposes only.
What Happens After A Vaccine Injury?
Stan Szymanski (or Encouraging Angels) is not a medical doctor. This is not medical advice. In all matters pertaining to the health and care of a human being consult a medical doctor. This is not legal, financial or personal advice. Consult appropriate professionals in those fields for that type of advice. For informational purposes only.
Stan Szymanski (or Encouraging Angels) is not a medical doctor. This is not medical advice. In all matters pertaining to the health and care of a human being consult a medical doctor. This is not legal, financial or personal advice. Consult appropriate professionals in those fields for that type of advice. For informational purposes only.
Stan Szymanski (or Encouraging Angels) is not a medical doctor. This is not medical advice. In all matters pertaining to the health and care of a human being consult a medical doctor. This is not legal, financial or personal advice. Consult appropriate professionals in those fields for that type of advice. For informational purposes only.
https://www.podbean.com/wlei/pb-3g2qc-183df16
Stan Szymanski (or Encouraging Angels) is not a medical doctor. This is not medical advice. In all matters pertaining to the health and care of a human being consult a medical doctor. This is not legal, financial or personal advice. Consult appropriate professionals in those fields for that type of advice. For informational purposes only.
Image Credit: June Gold at Amazon
By Stan Szymanski
By nature I am not a political person. But I most certainly believe that the Constitution of the United States of America is the most important document in the history of the world that guarantees the rights of American citizens.
So it was with shock when I read that Rep. Jody Arrington (R-TX. 19th District) had introduced H.Con.Res.15 - Calling an Article V Convention for proposing a Fiscal Responsibility Amendment to the United States Constitution and stipulating ratification by a vote of We the People, and for other purposes.
As I understand it, the stated purpose of this proposed bill is a form of a ‘balanced budget amendment’. That sounds great on the surface. The problem is if you look just under the surface you may see the monstrosity for what it really is.
There are currently 27 amendments to the Constitution of the United States. I say this as a reminder to Rep. Arrington and anyone else who is supporting H. Con. Res. 15-If you would like to pass an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, Article V of the Constitution provides two (2) ways to do this; not just the one you are proposing.
The first way is to just propose the amendment to congress and get a two thirds majority in the House of Representatives and a two-thirds majority in the Senate. This is how it has worked since 1789 in practice.
The problem with H. Con. Res. 15 is that this bill is proposing that ‘Fiscal Responsibility’ be accomplished through the convening of a Constitutional Convention or a ‘Con-Con’.
Why should we be concerned with those who call for and the process of calling for a ‘Con-Con’?:
__________________________
Please refer to our proviso at the end of the article regarding any reproduction of this writing (This means those who modify my writing for their benefit and own financial gain and even plagaristically put their name on my work) and consider a donation to Encouraging Angels today. We need your support
—————————————-
…’An Article V Constitutional Convention would threaten individual rights and our nation’s very form of government. Individual rights are secured by the Constitution, and a Con-Con would have the inherent power to become a “runaway” convention (emphasis added) that could completely change the Constitution. How do we know such a convention could become a “runaway”?
There’s the precedent of the Philadelphia Convention of 1787, which completely rewrote the Articles of Confederation and changed the ratification procedure; and
There’s the right of the sovereign people meeting in convention to alter or abolish their form of government (emphasis added) (as stated in the Declaration of Independence), which could include rewriting the Constitution and changing the ratification procedure.’…(John Birch Society)
In order to call a Con-Con two-thirds of the states must first agree. H.Con.Res. 15 uses misleading reasoning, IMHO, to meet the 2/3rds threshold:
…’Whereas congressional and State records of plenary applications for amendments on any subject and applications for the single subject of Inflation-fighting Fiscal Responsibility Amendments compiled by the Article V Library counts Nevada’s “continuing” application, reported February 8, 1979, in the Congressional Record, as the 34th thus achieving the “two thirds” congressional mandate to call the Convention for proposing amendments; congressional records reported 39 applications by the end of 1979, 40 in 1983, and 42 total applications over time’…(H. Con Res. 15)
So H. Con Res. 15 is apparently trying to use a claim of aggregation of applications (not a current vote) to reach the brink to call a Con-Con.
If a Constitutional Convention were indeed called, this proposed resolution does not limit the scope of the Con-Con. From what I understand, the delegates could bring anything to a vote that they wanted to.
Why is this dangerous?
Not only could one or numerous new constitutional amendments be proposed, but the the current form of government, as stated in the Constitution, could be abolished.
This is what happened in 1787 when the Constitutional Convention abolished the Articles of Confederation and brought forth the Constitution.
At a minimum, a Con-Con could bring about a reversal of the existing Constitutional limitations on governmental authority and intrusion into the live of the people. Nothing is off the table-It could literally be ‘anything goes’. Perhaps a smorgasbord of New World Order policies with a sprinkle of George Soros economics.
I called the office of Rep. Arrington this morning to check the status of H. Con Res. 15 and spoke to a nice young gentleman there and he told me that the proposed bill is in the House Judiciary Committee.
If you do not like the outline of the possibilities of H. Con Res. 15, perhaps it is time for you to call your representative and let them know your opinion before we are faced with the possibility of having our Constitution erased.
———-
If you appreciate this article can you consider a gift to Encouraging Angels for the intelligence we provided today? Click this link to give. We need the support. Links to this article are encouraged. Reproductions of this writing are only allowed by written permission of the author and those reproductions must include this proviso of request for support, how this writing may be reproduced and following disclaimers.
All opinions are that of the authors and not necessarily that of Encouraging Angels.
All rights reserved.
Stan Szymanski (or Encouraging Angels) is not a medical doctor. This is not medical advice. In all matters pertaining to the health and care of a human being consult a medical doctor. This is the not legal, financial or personal advice. Consult appropriate professionals in those fields for that type of advice. For informational purposes only.
Stan Szymanski (or Encouraging Angels) is not a medical doctor. This is not medical advice. In all matters pertaining to the health and care of a human being consult a medical doctor. This is not legal, financial or personal advice. Consult appropriate professionals in those fields for that type of advice. For informational purposes only.
From the literature:…’The healthcare workforce in the United States does not provide the same standard of care for people with disabilities as for nondisabled people. Many academic medical institutions do not routinely offer disability-conscious medical training, and many clinicians and medical educators feel ill-equipped to incorporate anti-ableist learning goals into their curricula. Drawing on a critical review of the literature and interviews with medical educators, representatives of professional organizations, and disability advocates, this article presents promising practices for disability-conscious undergraduate medical education. Disability-conscious education, which is grounded in the insights of disability studies and disability rights and justice frameworks, is distinguished from disability-specific education, which may not extend beyond biomedical models of disability. First, we define current approaches to teaching about disability, highlighting limitations and opportunities for further development. We then identify and analyze approaches to teaching about disability that support the development of disability consciousness among learners. With attention to both curricular format and theoretical frameworks, we offer concrete approaches that medical schools can take to equip students with the knowledge, attitudes, skills, and practices they need to provide equitable care for patients with disabilities…’
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10401334.2025.2464672
Stan Szymanski (or Encouraging Angels) is not a medical doctor. This is not medical advice. In all matters pertaining to the health and care of a human being consult a medical doctor. This is not legal, financial or personal advice. Consult appropriate professionals in those fields for that type of advice. For informational purposes only.
Stan Szymanski (or Encouraging Angels) is not a medical doctor. This is not medical advice. In all matters pertaining to the health and care of a human being consult a medical doctor. This is not legal, financial or personal advice. Consult appropriate professionals in those fields for that type of advice. For informational purposes onily.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=RmsVw7Jt9gM
Stan Szymanski (or Encouraging Angels) is not a medical doctor. This is not medical advice. In all matters pertaining to the health and care of a human being consult a medical doctor. This is not legal, financial or personal advice. Consult appropriate professionals in those fields for that type of advice. For informational purposes only.
Stan Szymanski (or Encouraging Angels) is not a medical doctor. This is not medical advice. In all matters pertaining to the health and care of a human being consult a medical doctor. This is not legal, financial or personal advice. Consult appropriate professionals in those fields for that type of advice. For informational purposes only.
https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/measles-natural-immunity-superior?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Stan Szymanski (or Encouraging Angels) is not a medical doctor. This is not medical advice. In all matters pertaining to the health and care of a human being consult a medical doctor. This is not legal, financial or personal advice. Consult appropriate professionals in those fields for that type of advice. For informational purposes only.
https://www.podbean.com/wlei/pb-5pivg-182a27d
Stan Szymanski (or Encouraging Angels) is not a medical doctor. This is not medical advice. In all matters pertaining to the health and care of a human being consult a medical doctor. This is not legal, financial or personal advice. Consult appropriate professionals in those fields for that type of advice. For informational purposes only.
All Rights Reserved.
Encouraging Angels is a tax-exempt 501(c)(3) organization that promotes Disability and Speical Needs awareness as well as delivering music services to those affected.
Powered by Squarespace
